Export limit exceeded: 337808 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (337808 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-12148 | 1 Search-guard | 1 Search Guard | 2025-10-30 | N/A |
| In Search Guard versions 3.1.1 and earlier, Field Masking (FM) rules are improperly enforced on fields of type IP (IP Address). While the content of these fields is properly redacted in the _source document returned by search operations, the results do return documents (hits) when searching based on a specific IP values. This allows to reconstruct the original contents of the field. Workaround - If you cannot upgrade immediately, you can avoid the problem by using field level security (FLS) protection on fields of the affected types instead of field masking. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12147 | 1 Search-guard | 1 Search Guard | 2025-10-30 | N/A |
| In Search Guard FLX versions 3.1.1 and earlier, Field-Level Security (FLS) rules are improperly enforced on object-valued fields. When an FLS exclusion rule (e.g., ~field) is applied to a field which contains an object as its value, the object is correctly removed from the _source returned by search operations. However, the object members (i.e., child attributes) remain accessible to search queries. This exposure allows adversaries to infer or reconstruct the original contents of the excluded object. Workaround - If you cannot upgrade immediately and FLS exclusion rules are used for object valued attributes (like ~object), add an additional exclusion rule for the members of the object (like ~object.*). | ||||
| CVE-2025-12142 | 1 Abb | 1 Terra Ac Wallbox Jp | 2025-10-30 | 6.1 Medium |
| Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in ABB Terra AC wallbox.This issue affects Terra AC wallbox: through 1.8.33. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11632 | 2 Jgrietveld, Wordpress | 2 Call Now Button, Wordpress | 2025-10-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Call Now Button – The #1 Click to Call Button for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on multiple functions in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.4. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to generate links to billing portal, where they can view and modify billing information of the connected, account, generate chat session tokens, view domain status, etc. This vulnerability was partially fixed in version 1.5.4 and fully fixed in version 1.5.5 | ||||
| CVE-2023-7320 | 2 Automattic, Wordpress | 2 Woocommerce, Wordpress | 2025-10-30 | 5.3 Medium |
| The WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in versions up to, and including, 7.8.2, due to improper CORS handling on the Store API's REST endpoints allowing direct external access from any origin. This can allow unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive user information including PII(Personal Identifiable Information). | ||||
| CVE-2025-52451 | 4 Linux, Microsoft, Salesforce and 1 more | 5 Linux, Linux Kernel, Windows and 2 more | 2025-10-30 | 8.5 High |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Salesforce Tableau Server on Windows, Linux (tabdoc api - create-data-source-from-file-upload modules) allows Absolute Path Traversal.This issue affects Tableau Server: before 2025.1.3, before 2024.2.12, before 2023.3.19. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25009 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2025-10-30 | 8.7 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation in Kibana can lead to Stored XSS via case file upload. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61670 | 1 Bytecodealliance | 1 Wasmtime | 2025-10-30 | 3.3 Low |
| Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. Wasmtime 37.0.0 and 37.0.1 have memory leaks in the C/C++ API when using bindings for the `anyref` or `externref` WebAssembly values. This is caused by a regression introduced during the development of 37.0.0 and all prior versions of Wasmtime are unaffected. If `anyref` or `externref` is not used in the C/C++ API then embeddings are also unaffected by the leaky behavior. The `wasmtime` Rust crate is unaffected by this leak. Development of Wasmtime 37.0.0 included a refactoring in Rust of changing the old `ManuallyRooted<T>` type to a new `OwnedRooted<T>` type. This change was integrated into Wasmtime's C API but left the C API in a state which had memory leaks. Additionally the new ownership semantics around this type were not reflected into the C++ API, making it leak-prone. A short version of the change is that previously `ManuallyRooted<T>`, as the name implies, required manual calls to an "unroot" operation. If this was forgotten then the memory was still cleaned up when the `wasmtime_store_t` itself was destroyed eventually. Documentation of when to "unroot" was sparse and there were already situations prior to 37.0.0 where memory would be leaked until the store was destroyed anyway. All memory, though, was always bound by the store, and destroying the store would guarantee that there were no memory leaks. In migrating to `OwnedRooted<T>` the usage of the type in Rust changed. A manual "unroot" operation is no longer required and it happens naturally as a destructor of the `OwnedRooted<T>` type in Rust itself. These new resource ownership semantics were not fully integrated into the preexisting semantics of the C/C++ APIs in Wasmtime. A crucial distinction of `OwnedRooted<T>` vs `ManuallyRooted<T>` is that the `OwnedRooted<T>` type allocates host memory outside of the store. This means that if an `OwnedRooted<T>` is leaked then destroying a store does not release this memory and it's a permanent memory leak on the host. This led to a few distinct, but related, issues arising: A typo in the `wasmtime_val_unroot` function in the C API meant that it did not actually unroot anything. This meant that even if embedders faithfully call the function then memory will be leaked. If a host-defined function returned a `wasmtime_{externref,anyref}_t` value then the value was never unrooted. The C/C++ API no longer has access to the value and the Rust implementation did not unroot. This meant that any values returned this way were never unrooted. The goal of the C++ API of Wasmtime is to encode automatic memory management in the type system, but the C++ API was not updated when `OwnedRooted<T>` was added. This meant that idiomatic usage of the C++ API would leak memory due to a lack of destructors on values. These issues have all been fixed in a 37.0.2 release of Wasmtime. The implementation of the C and C++ APIs have been updated accordingly and respectively to account for the changes of ownership here. For example `wasmtime_val_unroot` has been fixed to unroot, the Rust-side implementation of calling an embedder-defined function will unroot return values, and the C++ API now has destructors on the `ExternRef`, `AnyRef`, and `Val` types. These changes have been made to the 37.0.x release branch in a non-API-breaking fashion. Changes to the 38.0.0 release branch (and `main` in the Wasmtime repository) include minor API updates to better accommodate the API semantic changes. The only known workaround at this time is to avoid using `externref` and `anyref` in the C/C++ API of Wasmtime. If avoiding those types is not possible then it's required for users to update to mitigate the leak issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-56426 | 1 Webkul | 1 Bagisto | 2025-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue WebKul Bagisto v.2.3.6 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Cart/Checkout API endpoint, specifically, the price calculation logic fails to validate quantity inputs properly. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25017 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2025-10-30 | 8.2 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation in Kibana can lead to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) | ||||
| CVE-2025-61780 | 1 Rack | 1 Rack | 2025-10-30 | 5.8 Medium |
| Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. Prior to versions 2.2.20, 3.1.18, and 3.2.3, a possible information disclosure vulnerability existed in `Rack::Sendfile` when running behind a proxy that supports `x-sendfile` headers (such as Nginx). Specially crafted headers could cause `Rack::Sendfile` to miscommunicate with the proxy and trigger unintended internal requests, potentially bypassing proxy-level access restrictions. When `Rack::Sendfile` received untrusted `x-sendfile-type` or `x-accel-mapping` headers from a client, it would interpret them as proxy configuration directives. This could cause the middleware to send a "redirect" response to the proxy, prompting it to reissue a new internal request that was not subject to the proxy's access controls. An attacker could exploit this by setting a crafted `x-sendfile-type: x-accel-redirect` header, setting a crafted `x-accel-mapping` header, and requesting a path that qualifies for proxy-based acceleration. Attackers could bypass proxy-enforced restrictions and access internal endpoints intended to be protected (such as administrative pages). The vulnerability did not allow arbitrary file reads but could expose sensitive application routes. This issue only affected systems meeting all of the following conditions: The application used `Rack::Sendfile` with a proxy that supports `x-accel-redirect` (e.g., Nginx); the proxy did **not** always set or remove the `x-sendfile-type` and `x-accel-mapping` headers; and the application exposed an endpoint that returned a body responding to `.to_path`. Users should upgrade to Rack versions 2.2.20, 3.1.18, or 3.2.3, which require explicit configuration to enable `x-accel-redirect`. Alternatively, configure the proxy to always set or strip the header, or in Rails applications, disable sendfile completely. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10759 | 1 Webkul | 1 Qloapps | 2025-10-30 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was detected in Webkul QloApps up to 1.7.0. This affects an unknown function of the component CSRF Token Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument token results in authorization bypass. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor explains: "As We are already aware about this vulnerability and our Internal team are already working on this issue. (...) We'll implement the fix for this vulnerability in our next major release." | ||||
| CVE-2025-8432 | 1 Centreon | 1 Centreon | 2025-10-30 | 8.4 High |
| Incorrect Default Permissions vulnerability in Centreon Infra Monitoring (MBI modules) allows Embedding Scripts within Scripts by CentreonBI user account on the MBI server This issue affects Infra Monitoring: from 24.10.0 before 24.10.6, from 24.04.0 before 24.04.9, from 23.10.0 before 23.10.15. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8406 | 2 Zenml, Zenmlio | 2 Zenml, Zenml | 2025-10-30 | 7.8 High |
| ZenML version 0.83.1 is affected by a path traversal vulnerability in the `PathMaterializer` class. The `load` function uses `is_path_within_directory` to validate files during `data.tar.gz` extraction, which fails to effectively detect symbolic and hard links. This vulnerability can lead to arbitrary file writes, potentially resulting in arbitrary command execution if critical files are overwritten. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25450 | 1 Mytaag | 1 Mytaag | 2025-10-30 | 5.1 Medium |
| An issue in TAAGSOLUTIONS GmbH MyTaag v.2024-11-24 and before allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the deactivation of the activated second factor to the /session endpoint | ||||
| CVE-2025-25451 | 1 Mytaag | 1 Mytaag | 2025-10-30 | 5.1 Medium |
| An issue in TAAGSOLUTIONS GmbH MyTaag v.2024-11-24 and before allows a physically proximate attacker to escalate privileges via the "2fa_authorized" Local Storage key | ||||
| CVE-2025-25452 | 1 Mytaag | 1 Mytaag | 2025-10-30 | 5.1 Medium |
| An issue in TAAGSOLUTIONS GmbH MyTaag v.2024-11-24 and before allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the "/user" endpoint | ||||
| CVE-2024-2961 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 9 Glibc, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 6 more | 2025-10-30 | 7.3 High |
| The iconv() function in the GNU C Library versions 2.39 and older may overflow the output buffer passed to it by up to 4 bytes when converting strings to the ISO-2022-CN-EXT character set, which may be used to crash an application or overwrite a neighbouring variable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11428 | 2025-10-29 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14439 | 2025-10-29 | N/A | ||
| No description is available for this CVE. | ||||