| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The imwptip plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Bitcoin Donate Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings, including donation addresses and display configurations, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Stop Spammers Classic plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2026.1. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ss_addtoallowlist class. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add arbitrary email addresses to the spam allowlist via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The vulnerability was partially patched in version 2026.1. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mikado-Themes Bard bardwp allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Bard: from n/a through <= 1.6. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Angel Costa WP SEO Search wp-seo-search allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP SEO Search: from n/a through <= 1.1. |
| Shenzhen Tenda W30E V2 firmware versions up to and including V16.01.0.19(5037) lack cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protections on administrative endpoints, including those used to change administrator account credentials. As a result, an attacker can craft malicious requests that, when triggered by an authenticated user’s browser, modify administrative passwords and other configuration settings. |
| Easy!Appointments is a self hosted appointment scheduler. In 1.5.2 and earlier, application/core/EA_Security.php::csrf_verify() only enforces CSRF for POST requests and returns early for non-POST methods. Several application endpoints perform state-changing operations while accepting parameters from GET (or $_REQUEST), so an attacker can perform CSRF by forcing a victim's browser to issue a crafted GET request. Impact: creation of admin accounts, modification of admin email/password, and full admin account takeover. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Paolo GeoDirectory allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects GeoDirectory: from n/a before 2.8.150. |
| sigstore-python is a Python tool for generating and verifying Sigstore signatures. Prior to version 4.2.0, the sigstore-python OAuth authentication flow is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery. `_OAuthSession` creates a unique "state" and sends it as a parameter in the authentication request but the "state" in the server response seems not not be cross-checked with this value. Version 4.2.0 contains a patch for the issue. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in winkm89 teachPress teachpress allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects teachPress: from n/a through <= 9.0.12. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in richardevcom Add Polylang support for Customizer add-polylang-support-for-customizer allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Add Polylang support for Customizer: from n/a through <= 1.4.5. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AA-Team SearchAzon searchazon allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects SearchAzon: from n/a through <= 1.4. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in gregmolnar Simple XML Sitemap simple-xml-sitemap allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Simple XML Sitemap: from n/a through <= 1.3. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in John James Jacoby WP Term Order wp-term-order allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Term Order: from n/a through <= 2.1.0. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Timur Kamaev Kama Thumbnail kama-thumbnail allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Kama Thumbnail: from n/a through <= 3.5.1. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mikado-Themes PawFriends - Pet Shop and Veterinary WordPress Theme pawfriends allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects PawFriends - Pet Shop and Veterinary WordPress Theme: from n/a through <= 1.3. |
| A security flaw has been discovered in PHPGurukul News Portal 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bdthemes Element Pack Elementor Addons bdthemes-element-pack-lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Element Pack Elementor Addons: from n/a through <= 8.3.13. |
| IBM ApplinX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. |
| The Login Page Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing nonce validation on the devotion_loginform_process() AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's login page settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
