| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Missing support for integrity check in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Missing support for integrity check in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Insufficient UI warning of dangerous operations in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. |
| Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Azure Stack allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. |
| Navigate CMS 2.8.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to upload malicious extensions through a crafted HTML page. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into executing arbitrary file uploads by leveraging the extension upload functionality without additional validation. |
| Inappropriate implementation in Animation in Google Chrome prior to 145.0.7632.45 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes WP Plugin Manager wp-plugin-manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Plugin Manager: from n/a through <= 1.4.7. |
| Axigen Mail Server before 10.5.57 and 10.6.x before 10.6.26 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WebAdmin interface through improper handling of the _s (breadcrumb) parameter. The application accepts state-changing requests via the GET method and automatically processes base64-encoded commands queued in the _s parameter immediately after administrator authentication. Attackers can craft malicious URLs that, when clicked by administrators, execute arbitrary administrative actions upon login without further user interaction, including creating rogue administrator accounts or modifying critical server configurations. |
| FlexNet Publisher 11.12.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious HTML form to trick authenticated users into submitting a request that creates a new local admin account with a predefined password. |
| cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers. Prior to 46.0.5, the public_key_from_numbers (or EllipticCurvePublicNumbers.public_key()), EllipticCurvePublicNumbers.public_key(), load_der_public_key() and load_pem_public_key() functions do not verify that the point belongs to the expected prime-order subgroup of the curve. This missing validation allows an attacker to provide a public key point P from a small-order subgroup. This can lead to security issues in various situations, such as the most commonly used signature verification (ECDSA) and shared key negotiation (ECDH). When the victim computes the shared secret as S = [victim_private_key]P via ECDH, this leaks information about victim_private_key mod (small_subgroup_order). For curves with cofactor > 1, this reveals the least significant bits of the private key. When these weak public keys are used in ECDSA , it's easy to forge signatures on the small subgroup. Only SECT curves are impacted by this. This vulnerability is fixed in 46.0.5. |
| The MMA Call Tracking plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.15. This is due to missing nonce validation when saving plugin configuration on the `mma_call_tracking_menu` admin page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify call tracking configuration settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in hogash Kallyas kallyas.This issue affects Kallyas: from n/a through <= 4.2. |
| The TITLE ANIMATOR plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings page form handler in `inc/settings-page.php`. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to change a user's password or create users via '/setup_login?sid=', affecting the 'username', 'password', and 'cpassword' parameters. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to delete commands individually via '/delete_command?sid=', using the 'cid' parameter. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to rename commands via '/rename_command?sid=', affecting the 'command_name' parameter. |
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. An authenticated user could cause another user to perform unwanted actions within the application they are logged into. This vulnerability is possible due to the lack of proper CSRF token implementation. Among other things, it is possible, using a POST request to delete all commands via '/delete_all_commands?sid='. |
| Qwik is a performance focused javascript framework. Prior to version 1.19.0, Qwik City’s server-side request handler inconsistently interprets HTTP request headers, which can be abused by a remote attacker to circumvent form submission CSRF protections using specially crafted or multi-valued Content-Type headers. This issue has been patched in version 1.19.0. |
| Qwik is a performance focused javascript framework. Prior to version 1.12.0, a typo in the regular expression within isContentType causes incorrect parsing of certain Content-Type headers. This issue has been patched in version 1.12.0. |
| The Open eClass platform (formerly known as GUnet eClass) is a complete course management system. Prior to version 4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in multiple teacher-restricted endpoints allows attackers to induce authenticated teachers to perform unintended actions, such as modifying assignment grades, via crafted requests. This issue has been patched in version 4.2. |
