| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| '.../...//' in Microsoft Office Outlook allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Dynamics 365 FastTrack Implementation Assets allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network. |
| Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. |
| '.../...//' in Microsoft Purview allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| httpsig-hyper is a hyper extension for http message signatures. An issue was discovered in `httpsig-hyper` prior to version 0.0.23 where Digest header verification could incorrectly succeed due to misuse of Rust's `matches!` macro. Specifically, the comparison `if matches!(digest, _expected_digest)` treated `_expected_digest` as a pattern binding rather than a value comparison, resulting in unconditional success of the match expression. As a consequence, digest verification could incorrectly return success even when the computed digest did not match the expected value. Applications relying on Digest verification as part of HTTP message signature validation may therefore fail to detect message body modification. The severity depends on how the library is integrated and whether additional signature validation layers are enforced. This issue has been fixed in `httpsig-hyper` 0.0.23. The fix replaces the incorrect `matches!` usage with proper value comparison and additionally introduces constant-time comparison for digest verification as defense-in-depth. Regression tests have also been added to prevent reintroduction of this issue. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to the patched version. There is no reliable workaround without upgrading. Users who cannot immediately upgrade should avoid relying solely on Digest verification for message integrity and ensure that full HTTP message signature verification is enforced at the application layer. |
| OpenClaw is a personal AI assistant. Prior to 2026.2.14, browser-facing localhost mutation routes accepted cross-origin browser requests without explicit Origin/Referer validation. Loopback binding reduces remote exposure but does not prevent browser-initiated requests from malicious origins. A malicious website can trigger unauthorized state changes against a victim's local OpenClaw browser control plane (for example opening tabs, starting/stopping the browser, mutating storage/cookies) if the browser control service is reachable on loopback in the victim's browser context. Starting in version 2026.2.14, mutating HTTP methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE) are rejected when the request indicates a non-loopback Origin/Referer (or `Sec-Fetch-Site: cross-site`). Other mitigations include enabling browser control auth (token/password) and avoid running with auth disabled. |
| Edimax EW-7438RPn 1.13 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the MAC filtering configuration interface. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to trick users into adding unauthorized MAC addresses to the device's filtering rules without their consent. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenText™ Web Site Management Server allows Cross Site Request Forgery. The vulnerability could make a user, with active session inside the product, click on a page that contains this malicious HTML triggering to perform changes unconsciously.
This issue affects Web Site Management Server: 16.7.0, 16.7.1. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpzita Zita Elementor Site Library zita-site-library allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Zita Elementor Site Library: from n/a through <= 1.6.6. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpcoachify Coachify coachify allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Coachify: from n/a through <= 1.1.5. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themastercut Revision Manager TMC revision-manager-tmc allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Revision Manager TMC: from n/a through <= 2.8.22. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themes4WP Popularis Extra popularis-extra allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Popularis Extra: from n/a through <= 1.2.10. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress RealPress realpress allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RealPress: from n/a through <= 1.1.0. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Moose Kenta Companion kenta-companion allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Kenta Companion: from n/a through <= 1.3.3. |
| The Whatsiplus Scheduled Notification for Woocommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'wsnfw_save_users_settings' AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin configuration settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Login Time Restriction allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Login Time Restriction: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.3. |
| SD.NET RIM versions before 4.7.3c contain a SQL injection vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious SQL statements through POST parameters 'idtyp' and 'idgremium'. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting specially formed POST requests to the /vorlagen/ endpoint, enabling unauthorized database manipulation and potential information disclosure. |
| An Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in Zscaler Client Connector on Windows during the Repair App functionality may allow Local Execution of Code.This issue affects Client Connector on Windows: before 4.1.0.62.
|
| An issue was discovered in MCMS 4.6.5. There is a CSRF vulnerability that can add an administrator account via ms/basic/manager/save.do. |
| The Mailchimp List Subscribe Form plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the mailchimp_sf_change_list_if_necessary() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change Mailchimp lists via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
