Export limit exceeded: 337953 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (337953 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-25819 | 1 Hms-networks | 2 Ewon Cosy, Ewon Flexy | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| HMS Networks Ewon Flexy with firmware before 15.0s4, Cosy+ with firmware 22.xx before 22.1s6, and Cosy+ with firmware 23.xx before 23.0s3 allows unauthenticated attackers to cause a Denial of Service by using a specially crafted HTTP request that leads to a reboot of the device, provided they have access to the device's GUI. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25818 | 1 Hms-networks | 2 Ewon Cosy, Ewon Flexy | 2026-03-13 | 9.1 Critical |
| HMS Networks Ewon Flexy with firmware before 15.0s4, Cosy+ with firmware 22.xx before 22.1s6, and Cosy+ with firmware 23.xx before 23.0s3 have weak entropy for authentication cookies, allowing an attacker with a stolen session cookie to find the user password by brute-forcing an encryption parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-25817 | 1 Hms-networks | 2 Ewon Cosy, Ewon Flexy | 2026-03-13 | 8.8 High |
| HMS Networks Ewon Flexy with firmware before 15.0s4, Cosy+ with firmware 22.xx before 22.1s6, and Cosy+ with firmware 23.xx before 23.0s3 have improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command allowing remote code execution by attackers with low privilege access on the gateway, provided the attacker has credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3927 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-03-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect security UI in PictureInPicture in Google Chrome prior to 146.0.7680.71 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-2415 | 1 Pretix | 1 Pretix | 2026-03-13 | 5.9 Medium |
| Emails sent by pretix can utilize placeholders that will be filled with customer data. For example, when {name} is used in an email template, it will be replaced with the buyer's name for the final email. This mechanism contained two security-relevant bugs: * It was possible to exfiltrate information about the pretix system through specially crafted placeholder names such as {{event.__init__.__code__.co_filename}}. This way, an attacker with the ability to control email templates (usually every user of the pretix backend) could retrieve sensitive information from the system configuration, including even database passwords or API keys. pretix does include mechanisms to prevent the usage of such malicious placeholders, however due to a mistake in the code, they were not fully effective for the email subject. * Placeholders in subjects and plain text bodies of emails were wrongfully evaluated twice. Therefore, if the first evaluation of a placeholder again contains a placeholder, this second placeholder was rendered. This allows the rendering of placeholders controlled by the ticket buyer, and therefore the exploitation of the first issue as a ticket buyer. Luckily, the only buyer-controlled placeholder available in pretix by default (that is not validated in a way that prevents the issue) is {invoice_company}, which is very unusual (but not impossible) to be contained in an email subject template. In addition to broadening the attack surface of the first issue, this could theoretically also leak information about an order to one of the attendees within that order. However, we also consider this scenario very unlikely under typical conditions. Out of caution, we recommend that you rotate all passwords and API keys contained in your pretix.cfg https://docs.pretix.eu/self-hosting/config/ file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7195 | 1 Redhat | 13 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Apicurio Registry and 10 more | 2026-03-13 | 6.4 Medium |
| Early versions of Operator-SDK provided an insecure method to allow operator containers to run in environments that used a random UID. Operator-SDK before 0.15.2 provided a script, user_setup, which modifies the permissions of the /etc/passwd file to 664 during build time. Developers who used Operator-SDK before 0.15.2 to scaffold their operator may still be impacted by this if the insecure user_setup script is still being used to build new container images. In affected images, the /etc/passwd file is created during build time with group-writable permissions and a group ownership of root (gid=0). An attacker who can execute commands within an affected container, even as a non-root user, may be able to leverage their membership in the root group to modify the /etc/passwd file. This could allow the attacker to add a new user with any arbitrary UID, including UID 0, leading to full root privileges within the container. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2451 | 1 Pretix | 3 Double Opt In Step, Pretix, Pretix-doistep | 2026-03-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Emails sent by pretix can utilize placeholders that will be filled with customer data. For example, when {name} is used in an email template, it will be replaced with the buyer's name for the final email. This mechanism contained a security-relevant bug: It was possible to exfiltrate information about the pretix system through specially crafted placeholder names such as {{event.__init__.__code__.co_filename}}. This way, an attacker with the ability to control email templates (usually every user of the pretix backend) could retrieve sensitive information from the system configuration, including even database passwords or API keys. pretix does include mechanisms to prevent the usage of such malicious placeholders, however due to a mistake in the code, they were not fully effective for this plugin. Out of caution, we recommend that you rotate all passwords and API keys contained in your pretix.cfg file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1090 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-13 | 8.7 High |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 10.6 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user, when the `markdown_placeholders` feature flag was enabled, to inject JavaScript in a browser due to improper sanitization of placeholder content in markdown processing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1069 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to cause a denial of service by sending specially crafted GraphQL requests due to uncontrolled recursion under certain circumstances. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14513 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.11 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to cause a denial of service condition due to improper input validation when processing specially crafted JSON payloads in the protected branches API. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13929 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 10.0 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to cause a denial of service by issuing specially crafted requests to repository archive endpoints under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13690 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-03-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.11 before 18.7.6, 18.8 before 18.8.6, and 18.9 before 18.9.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to cause a denial of service condition due to improper input validation on webhook custom header names under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3884 | 1 Redhat | 17 Amq Streams, Apache Camel Hawtio, Build Keycloak and 14 more | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Undertow that can cause remote denial of service attacks. When the server uses the FormEncodedDataDefinition.doParse(StreamSourceChannel) method to parse large form data encoding with application/x-www-form-urlencoded, the method will cause an OutOfMemory issue. This flaw allows unauthorized users to cause a remote denial of service (DoS) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32543 | 2026-03-13 | N/A | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in CyberChimps Responsive Blocks responsive-block-editor-addons allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Responsive Blocks: from n/a through <= 2.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32487 | 2026-03-13 | N/A | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in raratheme Lawyer Landing Page lawyer-landing-page allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Lawyer Landing Page: from n/a through <= 1.2.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32486 | 2026-03-13 | N/A | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in wptravelengine Travel Booking travel-booking allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Travel Booking: from n/a through <= 1.3.9. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32462 | 2026-03-13 | N/A | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Liton Arefin Master Addons for Elementor master-addons allows DOM-Based XSS.This issue affects Master Addons for Elementor: from n/a through <= 2.1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32461 | 2026-03-13 | N/A | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Really Simple Plugins Really Simple SSL really-simple-ssl allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Really Simple SSL: from n/a through <= 9.5.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32460 | 2026-03-13 | N/A | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Themefic Ultimate Addons for Contact Form 7 ultimate-addons-for-contact-form-7 allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Ultimate Addons for Contact Form 7: from n/a through <= 3.5.36. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32459 | 2026-03-13 | N/A | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in flycart UpsellWP checkout-upsell-and-order-bumps allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects UpsellWP: from n/a through <= 2.2.4. | ||||