Search Results (1512 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2022-37660 2 Hostapd, W1.fi 2 Hostapd, Hostapd 2025-11-03 6.5 Medium
In hostapd 2.10 and earlier, the PKEX code remains active even after a successful PKEX association. An attacker that successfully bootstrapped public keys with another entity using PKEX in the past, will be able to subvert a future bootstrapping by passively observing public keys, re-using the encrypting element Qi and subtracting it from the captured message M (X = M - Qi). This will result in the public ephemeral key X; the only element required to subvert the PKEX association.
CVE-2021-36647 1 Arm 1 Mbed Tls 2025-11-03 4.7 Medium
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm in the function mbedtls_mpi_exp_mod() in lignum.c in Mbed TLS Mbed TLS all versions before 3.0.0, 2.27.0 or 2.16.11 allows attackers with access to precise enough timing and memory access information (typically an untrusted operating system attacking a secure enclave such as SGX or the TrustZone secure world) to recover the private keys used in RSA.
CVE-2023-28997 1 Nextcloud 1 Desktop 2025-11-03 6.7 Medium
The Nextcloud Desktop Client is a tool to synchronize files from Nextcloud Server. Starting with version 3.0.0 and prior to version 3.6.5, a malicious server administrator can recover and modify the contents of end-to-end encrypted files. Users should upgrade the Nextcloud Desktop client to 3.6.5 to receive a patch. No known workarounds are available.
CVE-2021-3979 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat 8 Fedora, Ceph Storage, Ceph Storage For Ibm Z Systems and 5 more 2025-11-03 6.5 Medium
A key length flaw was found in Red Hat Ceph Storage. An attacker can exploit the fact that the key length is incorrectly passed in an encryption algorithm to create a non random key, which is weaker and can be exploited for loss of confidentiality and integrity on encrypted disks.
CVE-2014-5403 1 Hospira 1 Mednet 2025-11-03 N/A
Hospira MedNet before 6.1 uses hardcoded cryptographic keys for protection of data transmission from infusion pumps, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network.
CVE-2020-10377 1 Mitel 1 Mivoice Connect Client 2025-11-03 9.8 Critical
A weak encryption vulnerability in Mitel MiVoice Connect Client before 214.100.1214.0 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to user credentials. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to access the system with compromised user credentials.
CVE-2014-2381 2 Invensys, Schneider Electric 2 Wonderware Information Server, Wonderware Information Server Portal 2025-11-01 N/A
Schneider Electric Wonderware Information Server (WIS) Portal 4.0 SP1 through 5.5 uses weak encryption, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a credential file.
CVE-2014-2380 2 Invensys, Schneider Electric 2 Wonderware Information Server, Wonderware Information Server Portal 2025-11-01 N/A
Schneider Electric Wonderware Information Server (WIS) Portal 4.0 SP1 through 5.5 uses weak encryption, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading a credential file.
CVE-2025-9239 2 Eladmin, Elunez 2 Eladmin, Eladmin 2025-10-31 3.7 Low
A vulnerability was identified in elunez eladmin up to 2.7. Affected by this vulnerability is the function EncryptUtils of the file eladmin-common/src/main/java/me/zhengjie/utils/EncryptUtils.java of the component DES Key Handler. The manipulation of the argument STR_PARAM with the input Passw0rd leads to inadequate encryption strength. The attack can be initiated remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitation appears to be difficult.
CVE-2024-30152 1 Hcltech 1 Hcl Sx 2025-10-30 6.5 Medium
HCL SX v21 is affected by usage of a weak cryptographic algorithm. An attacker could exploit this weakness to gain access to sensitive information, modify data, or other impacts.
CVE-2025-54471 1 Suse 1 Neuvector 2025-10-30 6.5 Medium
NeuVector used a hard-coded cryptographic key embedded in the source code. At compilation time, the key value was replaced with the secret key value and used to encrypt sensitive configurations when NeuVector stores the data.
CVE-2024-33891 1 Delinea 1 Secret Server 2025-10-28 8.8 High
Delinea Secret Server before 11.7.000001 allows attackers to bypass authentication via the SOAP API in SecretServer/webservices/SSWebService.asmx. This is related to a hardcoded key, the use of the integer 2 for the Admin user, and removal of the oauthExpirationId attribute.
CVE-2025-21062 1 Samsung 1 Smart Switch 2025-10-28 7.8 High
Use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm in Smart Switch prior to version 3.7.67.2 allows local attackers to replace the restoring application. User interaction is required for triggering this vulnerability.
CVE-2025-11650 2 Furbo, Tomofun 6 Furbo 360 Dog Camera, Furbo 360 Dog Camera Firmware, Furbo Mini and 3 more 2025-10-28 1.8 Low
A vulnerability was determined in Tomofun Furbo 360 and Furbo Mini. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /etc/shadow of the component Password Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of weak hash. The physical device can be targeted for the attack. The attack requires a high level of complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The firmware versions determined to be affected are Furbo 360 up to FB0035_FW_036 and Furbo Mini up to MC0020_FW_074. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
CVE-2025-34500 1 Shuffle Master 1 Deck Mate 2 2025-10-27 N/A
Deck Mate 2's firmware update mechanism accepts packages without cryptographic signature verification, encrypts them with a single hard-coded AES key shared across devices, and uses a truncated HMAC for integrity validation. Attackers with access to the update interface - typically via the unit's USB update port - can craft or modify firmware packages to execute arbitrary code as root, allowing persistent compromise of the device's integrity and deck randomization process. Physical or on-premises access remains the most likely attack path, though network-exposed or telemetry-enabled deployments could theoretically allow remote exploitation if misconfigured. The vendor confirmed that firmware updates have been issued to correct these update-chain weaknesses and that USB update access has been disabled on affected units.
CVE-2025-46582 1 Zte 1 Zxmp M721 2025-10-27 7.7 High
A private key disclosure vulnerability exists in ZTE's ZXMP M721 product. A low-privileged user can bypass authorization checks to view the device's communication private key, resulting in key exposure and impacting communication security.
CVE-2025-59407 3 Flock Safety, Flocksafety, Google 7 Bravo Edge Ai Compute Device, Bravo Edge Ai Compute Device, Detectionprocessing and 4 more 2025-10-24 9.8 Critical
The Flock Safety DetectionProcessing com.flocksafety.android.objects application 6.35.33 for Android (installed on Falcon and Sparrow License Plate Readers and Bravo Edge AI Compute Devices) bundles a Java Keystore (flock_rye.bks) along with its hardcoded password (flockhibiki17) in its code. The keystore contains a private key.
CVE-2025-26340 1 Q-free 1 Maxtime 2025-10-24 8.8 High
A CWE-321 "Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key" in the JWT signing in Q-Free MaxTime less than or equal to version 2.11.0 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass the authentication via crafted HTTP requests.
CVE-2025-59408 2 Flock Safety, Flocksafety 2 Bravo Edge Ai Compute Device, Bravo Compute Box Firmware 2025-10-23 7.3 High
Flock Safety Bravo Edge AI Compute Device BRAVO_00.00_local_20241017 ships with Secure Boot disabled. This allows an attacker to flash modified firmware with no cryptographic protections.
CVE-2024-41986 1 Siemens 4 Opcenter Quality, Smartclient Modules, Soa Audit and 1 more 2025-10-22 6.4 Medium
A vulnerability has been identified in SmartClient modules Opcenter QL Home (SC) (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Audit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506), SOA Cockpit (All versions >= V13.2 < V2506). The affected application support insecure TLS 1.0 and 1.1 protocol. An attacker could achieve a man-in-the-middle attack and compromise confidentiality and integrity of data.